Forwarded by JackMack. No original source given.

Here's a good comparison of the Liberal American news media slant on U.S. foreign policy events of the past decade or so - in their continuing effort to convince the American people how to think:

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - good.
Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad.

Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - good.
Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - bad.

Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good.
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad.

Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists - good.
Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad.

Clinton bombs Chinese embassy - good.
Bush bombs terrorist camps - bad.

Clinton commits felonies while in office - good.
Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit - bad.

Clinton says mass graves in Serbia - good.
Entire world says WMD in Iraq - bad.

Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton - good.
Recession under Bush - bad.

Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good.
World Trade Centers fall under Bush - Bad.

Clinton says Saddam has nukes - good.
Bush says Saddam has nukes - bad.

Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - good.
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad.

Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - good.
Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - bad.

No mass graves found in Serbia - good.
No WMD found Iraq - bad.

Milosevic not yet convicted - good.
Saddam in custody - bad.

(We won't be seeing this in the NY Times, Washington Post and other Liberal newspapers, nor hear it from the three stooges on network TV news, but that doesn't mean the comparisons aren't for real.)